John Head and his journeymen and apprentices knew how to make boxes. They made scores and scores of boxes; carcases of chest on chests, high chests and dressing tables, spice boxes, desks, 4-tier chests of drawers, and the drawers they contained. Hundreds of “boxes” were produced by joiners in the Head shop from the end of the 1710s to the mid 1740s. They needed to make them quickly and efficiently. Examination of carcases and the drawers in them documented and attributed to the John Head shop show us some of the ways they did this. In many respects, their dovetailed box production was similar to the majority of work done in most British and British colonial shops but several of Head’s ways of working reveal he was ready to break with aesthetic tradition to produce boxes more quickly than his competitors. Head may have had training in veneering carcase work before he immigrated to Philadelphia, but after he arrived here he would only work with solid wood carcases and drawer fronts. This required lapped, or half-blind, dovetails cut at the front corners of drawers, the top of chests, and the front and rear corners of dressing tables, as these joints would not be covered with veneer and the end grain of the dovetails would otherwise have shown in the finished work.
Most important for efficiency in producing carcase work with drawers was the fact that in Head’s shop, carcase construction and drawer construction were nearly identical. If you taught an apprentice how to design, mark out, and construct a drawer with a lapped dovetail front, that would be all they needed to learn to produce any carcase or drawer in the future, for the carcase is just a drawer stood on end and turned round. The front of a drawer corresponds to the top of a carcase, the sides of the drawer correspond to sides of the carcase, and the back of the drawer, to the bottom of the carcase. The bottom of the drawer is equivalent to the back of the carcase. This is not particular to Head’s shop, other joiners worked this way. But many British joiners making veneered carcases cut the dovetails on the top and bottom boards of a carcase. Head reversed this so the dovetails were cut on the side boards so that the dovetails were lapped to the top and not visible when looking at the top board of a chest of drawers, high chest, or spice box, making the construction of a carcase equivalent to that of a drawer.
Anyone who cuts lapped dovetails knows the greater difficulty in removing the waste of the dovetail recesses in the pin board then when cutting through dovetails. To decrease the difficulty, Head continued his saw kerf well past the gauged line on the interior surface of the drawer front. Other joiners did this as well and it is sometimes seen in London work but it is rare any joiner exceeds the lengths of Heads kerf cuts which often extend over two-and-a-half inches past his gauged layout line. Many joiners chose not to saw past the gauge line for what must only be aesthetic reasons. And no woodworking student has been taught to run saw kerfs past the gauge line for many decades. Even slight over-cuts are today considered sloppy work.
With the enormous amount of carcase and drawer work produced in Head’s shop, there would have been many occasions when more than one chest was being constructed at the same time. The chalk shop markings seen at the back of drawers on Head’s documented work and work attributed to his shop, facilitated an efficient work flow. Not only did they help identify the numerous drawer sides and backs in piles on the bench waiting to be worked into drawers, but the size and shape of the markings helped in quickly identifying and orienting the parts during joint cutting.
In the next post I’ll make a small drawer in the style of John Head as a way of investigating the drawer construction process. How was the drawer front supported while sawing, how were the shop marks used to rapidly select and position drawer parts during joinery and assembly? Knowing vs. Doing? Doing is Knowing?
7 thoughts on “Boxes in Boxes”
Great post Chris!
John Head’s work precisely echoes that of his former countrymen’s cabinetwork (when made in the solid). Unfortunately not many British cabinetmakers’ work is as easily identified or attributed as Head’s and other colonial cabinetmakers’.
A few years ago I wrote about generic mid-eighteenth-century British drawer construction which closely parallels Head’s work. You can read the post here:
Jack, thank you, as always. I’m going to read your post next thing. We are indeed lucky for the survival and discovery of Head’s account book. He was lucky, as were we, he landed where he did. Simple joinery? But a complicated story to put onto words! As you know. BTW Stiefel’s account of Head’s experience, life, and business will be released in hard copy in December.
Reading of Head’s life and work is as close as I can get to that of any British cabinetmaker of the eighteenth-century, so Stiefel’s book will be on my shopping list.
Another great post. Thnx. Head’s only mention of veneered furniture was in his earliest dated entry, in 1718. It pertained to a chest of drawers costing £8.0.0. The profusion of well-figured solid woods (walnut primarily, but also maple and cherry) native to his new home may have contributed to his decision never to have recorded another veneered piece. The extremes of weather then prevalent also made for an inhospitable environment for veneers. Philadelphia winters were so cold that the Delaware often froze, and its summers so hot that people sometimes keeled over and died.
Thank you for referencing The Cabinetmaker’s Account: John Head’s Record of Craft and Commerce in Colonial Philadelphia, 1718–1753 (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 2019).
You and your readers are cordially invited to the launch, at the American Philosophical Society, on December 10. To rsvp to the event, or to pre-order copies at a discount, please visit:
The US book starts in Philadelphia on January 10, at the Union League, and includes Sotheby’s on January 15, LancasterHistory on January 24, and Winterthur on April 25. Dates for the UK book tour have not yet been set.
Those wishing additional talks and book-signings may contact me at email@example.com. Sorry, Jack, Australia may be too far!
Thanks and warm wishes.
I see early furniture using Atlantic
White Cedar, but then it seems to
have fallen out of favor
What are reasons to use cedar?
and why did the use pretty much stop?
In answer to your queries:
1. White cedar was popular as a secondary wood as it was an easy wood to cleave. A tool for this was the froe. One appears listed in the probate inventory of Philadelphia joiner Barnard Eaglesfield (d. 1730). See my article on him in Chipstone’s American Furniture (2015). Chris can speak more knowledgeably, having worked extensively with it.
2. Per Kalm, the Swedish naturalist who visited the Delaware Vally c. 1748–1750, noted his concern that Philadelphia might run out of white cedar because of its extensive use as roof shingles and its not being replanted in the New Jersey swamps from which it was being harvested. The diary of his travels was first published in English in 1770 and is quoted in The Cabinetmaker’s Account. Kalm also noted that the local joiners were switching to poplar as a secondary wood, but did not like it as much as the more easily worked cedar.
John Head’s shop did not use poplar as a secondary wood in its furniture. Head did buy poplar, but probably used it in making the hat boxes sold to his hatter son John, Jr., and hatter sons-in-law.
In my last post, I meant to write “hat blocks” not “hat boxes.” John Head, Jr., later a wealthy merchant, began as a hatter as did some of his brothers-in-law. John Head the joiner supplied them with the blocks, which were made out of four-inch poplar.
John Head also made and sold hat boxes. As no surviving examples can be attributed to Head’s shop, I illustrate an unattributed, walnut tri-cornered hatbox inlaid “HUGH BOYD ESQr.” Boyd was a West Nottingham Township, PA, property owner who died in 1754, the same year as Head.