The Center For Art in Wood residency program is now well underway. Katie Hundall is the visual documentarian this year (while also making stuff, of course.) You can follow our story on the Residency Blog Katie is regularly updating. It can be found here.
We’re working at the NextFab North facility in our own space and the adjacent common work areas.









There is an Open Studio Day for the Windgate ITE Fellowship at NextFab on July 9th where you can come and see what we’ve been up to.
It would be an interesting experiment to take a radius off of one of John Head’s backboards or something for the camber of the iron. Sometimes the work I’ve seen shows very slight camber, but other times it is quite stark. Moxon describes trying with a foreplane as starting off with a very rank set iron, and backing it off gradually, but I also wonder if it isn’t a bit easier to just keep two foreplanes on hand, one more fore than the other.
The camber on the iron I shaped is similar to the marks you find on Head’s backboards and drawer bottoms. It’s somewhere in the middle of the camber profiles I’ve seen on historic woodwork. It’s difficult to see evidence that a woodworker backed off a fore plane iron while working as all woodworking is reductive. I doubt, however, that anyone worked as Moxon describes, it just doesn’t make sense from a woodworking perspective. You remove saw marks and do initial thickening with a fore plane then use a try plane with a slight camber to finish the surface. If there is more than one fore plane listed in a joiners inventory it is surely for the use of apprentices and journeymen.
Thanks for the question!
Hi Chris,
That’s really a neat project. I’m looking forward to your post reviewing and contrasting your plane with the later models. By the way, what wood did you use for your plane?
Regards
Frank Duff
Thanks. The wood used for the plane is European beech that I had from Dan at Red Rose Reproductions.